Baltimore Orioles: Hung up on opt-outs?

Courtesy of Peter Llewellyn-USA TODAY Sports
Courtesy of Peter Llewellyn-USA TODAY Sports

Are the Baltimore Orioles stuck on the addition of an opt-out clause with Yovani Gallardo?

The Baltimore Orioles appear poised to sign pitcher Yovani Gallardo. In fact, I honestly thought it would be done by now – I really did. My personal opinion was that today’s column would be announcing the signing (pending a physical, of course).

Courtesy of Peter Llewellyn-USA TODAY Sports
Courtesy of Peter Llewellyn-USA TODAY Sports /

But obviously we’re still waiting. So why is this taking a bit longer? Could it be…the O’s are balking on giving an opt-out clause? That’s just speculation, however…think about it.

Owner Peter Angelos isn’t a fan of opt-out clauses, and I’ve told you my own aversion to them as well. I feel that it basically gives the player the right to backtrack on the deal. Ironically, it’s making the right to backtrack on the deal PART OF the deal. There’s something about that which just doesn’t sit right with me.

Live Feed class=inline-text id=inline-text-5
Milwaukee Brewers: 15 Greatest Pitchers in Franchise History
Milwaukee Brewers: 15 Greatest Pitchers in Franchise History /

Reviewing the Brew

  • Taking a look at the all-time Milwaukee Brewers team ... with a twistCall to the Pen
  • Brewers: Remembering 3 Players Who Led These Pitcher Hitting StatsReviewing the Brew
  • Brewers: Newest Wall of Honor Inductees Impact Felt TodayReviewing the Brew
  • Brewers: Gomez, Gallardo, & Rodriguez to be inducted into Wall of FameReviewing the Brew
  • Milwaukee Brewers: A history of recent Brewers no-hit bidsReviewing the Brew
  • Yet these opt-out clauses are something that we’re seeing more and more. They aren’t exactly new, but they’re newish. And again for the record, I don’t know that’s why the deal hasn’t been done yet. I’m just speculating and assuming. As I said, the O’s have always hesitated to give an opt-out clause on a contract.

    But here’s a rhetorical question; are the Orioles and Peter Angelos just behind with the times on this? I mean, teams are starting to give these clauses in contracts, which in my view is a self-damning feature. So if it falls under the category of everyone’s doing it, are they putting themselves at a disadvantage if they aren’t? 

    More from Orioles News

    In this specific case if in fact it’s an opt-out clause that’s holding the negotiations up, I would suggest that the Orioles have more leverage than Gallardo. Are there any other teams who are interested in him? Perhaps there are and it’s just not public knowledge, however it seems to me that the O’s are the only one hot on his trail. In other words, it might behoove him to take whatever deal the Orioles are willing to offer him.

    Next: Baltimore Orioles: Dylan Bundy has his career in the balance

    In this particular case it’s also possible that allowing a player to opt-out might not be a horrible thing. You really never know who’s going to be available on the market year-over-year when it comes to trades and so forth. However it’s also the principle of the matter, and that’s something with which I agree wholeheartedly. When you sign a deal you sign a deal – and you shouldn’t go back on your word.